Public Meetings Report. Illustration by Holley Appold/South Side Weekly
Public Meetings Report. Illustration by Holley Appold/South Side Weekly
  1. Public Meetings Report – March 18, 2021
  2. Public Meetings Report – April 1, 2021
  3. Public Meetings Report – April 15, 2021
  4. Public Meetings Report – April 29, 2021
  5. Public Meetings Report – May 13, 2021
  6. Public Meetings Report – May 27, 2021
  7. Public Meetings Report – June 10, 2021
  8. Public Meetings Report – June 24, 2021
  9. Public Meetings Report – July 08, 2021
  10. Public Meetings Report – July 22, 2021
  11. Public Meetings Report – August 05, 2021
  12. Public Meetings Report – August 19, 2021
  13. Public Meetings Report – September 30, 2021
  14. Public Meetings Report – October 14, 2021
  15. Public Meetings Report – October 28, 2021
  16. Public Meetings Report – November 11, 2021
  17. Public Meetings Report – November 25, 2021
  18. Public Meetings Report – December 9, 2021
  19. Public Meetings Report – January 13, 2022
  20. Public Meetings Report – January 27, 2022
  21. Public Meetings Report – February 10, 2022
  22. Public Meetings Report – February 24, 2022
  23. Public Meetings Report – March 10, 2022
  24. Public Meetings Report – March 24, 2022
  25. Public Meetings Report – April 7, 2022
  26. Public Meetings Report – April 21, 2022
  27. Public Meetings Report – May 5, 2022
  28. Public Meetings Report – May 19, 2022
  29. Public Meetings Report – June 2, 2022
  30. Public Meetings Report – June 22, 2022
  31. Public Meetings Report – June 30, 2022
  32. Public Meetings Report – July 14, 2022
  33. Public Meetings Report – July 28, 2022
  34. Public Meetings Report – August 11, 2022
  35. Public Meetings Report – August 25, 2022
  36. Public Meetings Report — October 20, 2022
  37. Public Meetings Report — November 17, 2022
  38. Public Meetings Report — December 1, 2022
  39. Public Meetings Report — January 12, 2023
  40. Public Meetings Report — January 26, 2023
  41. Public Meetings Report — February 9, 2023
  42. Public Meetings Report — February 23, 2023
  43. Public Meetings Report — March 9, 2023
  44. Public Meetings Report — March 23, 2023
  45. Public Meetings Report — April 20, 2023
  46. Public Meetings Report — May 4, 2023
  47. Public Meetings Report — May 18, 2023
  48. Public Meetings Report — June 1, 2023
  49. Public Meetings Report — June 15, 2023
  50. Public Meetings Report — June 29, 2023
  51. Public Meetings Report — July 13, 2023
  52. Public Meetings Report — July 27, 2023
  53. Public Meetings Report — August 10, 2023
  54. Public Meetings Report — August 24, 2023
  55. Public Meetings Report — September 7, 2023
  56. Public Meetings Report — September 21, 2023
  57. Public Meetings Report — December 7, 2023
  58. Public Meetings Report — February 1, 2024
  59. Public Meetings Report — February 15, 2024
  60. Public Meetings Report — April 11, 2024
  61. Public Meetings Report — May 9, 2024
  62. Public Meetings Report — May 23, 2024
  63. Public Meetings Report — July 18, 2024
  64. Public Meetings Report — August 1, 2024
  65. Public Meetings Report — August 15, 2024
  66. Public Meetings Report — August 29, 2024
  67. Public Meetings Report — October 10, 2024
  68. Public Meetings Report — October 24, 2024
  69. Public Meetings Report — November 7, 2024
  70. Public Meetings Report — November 21, 2024
  71. Public Meetings Report — January 16, 2025
  72. Public Meetings Report — January 30, 2025
  73. Public Meetings Report — February 13, 2025
  74. Public Meetings Report — February 27, 2025
  75. What Does The Public Meetings Report Mean to You?
  76. Public Meetings Report — March 13, 2025
  77. Public Meetings Report — March 27, 2025
  78. Public Meetings Report — April 24, 2025
  79. Public Meetings Report — May 22, 2025
  80. Public Meetings Report — June 19, 2025
  81. Public Meetings Report — August 14, 2025

June 18

At its meeting, the Metra Board of Directors looked toward the future as it took these steps: extending Axon’s contract to March 2030, which emphasizes AI’s role in Metra’s policing methods; highlighting the need to update an aging IT infrastructure in connection with ticketing management and customer service, and projecting cautious optimism about avoiding the projected fiscal cliff in 2026. The Axon website describes the company as “the leading operating system for public safety.” Services in the form of branded products, for example, claim to cut report-writing time by law enforcement “in half” by transcribing and organizing video footage; to scan more license plates faster, and surveil public air space to track “unauthorized drones.” Before the Board of Directors meeting, Metra’s chief financial officer, John Morris, reported on behalf of the Committee on Finance and Budget. He noted that operating revenue is $10 million higher than the projected 2025 budget, offsetting less-than-anticipated revenue from passenger services. At the time of the meeting, expenses for operations were $31.1 million under budget with expenses for May being $8.1 million under budget. Morris attributes the savings to reduced administrative costs. The Capital Delivery and Project Management Office Report was presented by Phil Pasterak, program manager. Thirty-one projects have been completed since 2019, forty-three have begun construction and another fifty-four projects are in preliminary engineering. A majority of projects discussed affected the Metra Electric line. The Board also received a presentation on “Metra’s Comprehensive Approach to Bridges.” Metra lines cross 926 bridges each day, 446 of which Metra owns. A program is designed to replace five bridges and rehabilitate five bridges each year over twenty years. The estimated minimum cost is $140 million annually. There were no public comments.

June 23

The meeting of Police District Council 005: Roseland/Pullman/Riverdale focused on two main topics: the district’s strategic plan and an expected workforce allocation study. In a presentation, council member Thomas L. McMahon reviewed the priorities the council had set in the district’s strategic plan. Shootings were identified as the top priority, and the plan specified “the highest concentration of these shootings occurred on beat 511, which encompasses the area of 95th to 103rd” streets or essentially from Harvard Avenue to Stony Island Avenue. The second priority was robberies, which McMahon described as being in the “20th sector out south.” Third on the priorities list, McMahon said, were drug sales and littering at 111th and State Street. In the development of the district’s strategic plan, he explained that police are believed to be the crime experts but that community engagement needs stronger advocacy. He also suggests the district’s strategic plan can be improved by transparency and measures of progress. The councils are looking to the police department’s superintendent, Larry Snelling, to include meaningful input from the councils. Regarding workforce allocation, McMahon outlined the question of whether to use police officers from established beats, tactical teams or Chicago Alternative Policing Strategy (CAPS) teams. Police district councils were recommended by the Community Policing Advisory Panel in 2017 to increase community involvement in “crime reduction and problem-solving strategies” and to ensure “programming … consistent with the principles of community policing.” There are twenty-five councils, seven of which provide reports in Spanish and one that offers its reports in Chinese.

July 8

At its meeting, the fourteen-member City Council Committee on Pedestrian and Traffic Safety approved without objection “direct” items for prohibited disabled parking spots, recommended items for stop signs and prohibited disabled parking spots, and “no-recommendation” items for stop signs, prohibited disabled parking spots, repeals to prohibited disabled parking spots, residential permit parking zones, and parking restrictions. Committee Chair Daniel La Spata (1st Ward) explained that “no-recommendation” items have not received recommendations from City departments but were submitted as “overrides.” There was one public commenter, George Blakemore, who is known as “Concerned Citizen” and the “51st Alderman” because he has for years attended and spoken out at City Council meetings. In his allotted three minutes, he proceeded to recognize the presence of City staff members, calling them “disgraceful” and saying they “set a bad example”; called for the Council meetings to be televised; claimed most of the few attendees were being paid [to attend]; and concluded with “There’s something evil here; there’s something un-American here.” Chair La Spata told Blakemore, “There’s a line and you are stepping on it.” Blakemore left the meeting shouting. Although “safety” in its title, officially, this Committee has “jurisdiction over all orders, ordinances, resolutions and matters relating to regulating vehicular, bicycle and pedestrian traffic,” according to Chicago Councilmatic. That jurisdiction extends to matters that affect the bureaus of Street Traffic, of Parking, and of Police Traffic. 

July 17

The Chicago Plan Commission considered and acted on four items at its meeting. A residential plan to expand the XS tennis site at 5301 South State was approved. The plan proposes rezoning the area into a community shopping district (B3-3) from its current designation as a limited manufacturing/business park district. The developer plans to construct a five-story building with fifty-one affordable housing units and a six-story, 125-key Marriott Hotel that would include seventy-two parking spaces. The $25 million project would create one hundred temporary jobs and result in twenty-five permanent jobs, the developer claims. It would also provide two thousand square feet of commercial business space. One public commenter, who said her family has lived in the area since 1914, supported the project but criticized the building’s height and the disruption it would cause during construction. Another commenter compared the process to the gentrification of Bronzeville, complaining that residents have not been involved enough and that the focus has been on “elites” or visitors. Three other proposals were also approved. A one-million dollar park at 141 West Diversey Parkway, which was applied for by the Chicago Park District under the Lake Michigan and Chicago Lakefront Protection Ordinance, would occupy 26,781 square feet. The Commission also approved a proposal by Loyola for a six-story building no more than ninety-feet high at 6551-6581 North Sheridan Road. The space will be used for classrooms, research, and laboratories. The Burnside, Calumet, and Pullman Industrial Corridors were approved for remediation of environmental issues over several years. Job creation along with improved health and safety are the hoped-for results.

✶ ✶ ✶ ✶

This information was collected and curated by the Weekly in large part using reporting from City Bureau’s Documenters at documenters.org.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *